DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41449>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41449 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-26 11:06 ------- If backend lock provider provides support of multiple lockdb then in my opinion, DAVGenericLockDB must appear in <Directory> container. In that case this is a invalid bug. <Directory /x> ... DavGenericLockDB var/DAVLock1 .. </Directory> <Directory /x> ... DavGenericLockDB var/DAVLock2 .. </Directory> If the backend provider only supports a single lock db then it make sense to make it a "Main configuration" directive. As a safe option, it is made as a directive to be used in Directory container. So I think we can mark this bug as "Invalid" bug. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
