DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41551>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41551 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-16 02:18 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Created an attachment (id=19948) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19948&action=view) [edit] > don't use apr_table_copy to store/recall headers > naive patch to deep copy in/out headers before storing/retrieving from cache. > when retrieving, we only bother to do the deep copy to appease pool debugging, > who would abort even when the cache pool is longer living, but not an ancester > of, the request pool. No. Your patch didn't resolve this issue. The same error still was blown away. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
