DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36770>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36770 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-23 13:24 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > This is a partial valid point, but > > If a request goes to a name based host that has set keepalive off the > connection > can be shutdown by the server and this seems to be the right thing to do in > this > situation. Agreed. > On the other hand if a request goes to a name based virtual host and the next > request on this connection goes to a different name based virtual host. What > is > the correct keepalive timeout to use? > You could find arguments for both options: > 1. It should be the one of the host that just processed the request. > 2. It should be the one of the host that processes the next request. we can't possibly know what host is going to process the next request though, since we haven't even gotten the request. I would say it makes the most sense to use the keepalivetimeout setting for the virtualhost that processed the most recent request. Not to mention that such a scenario is probably pretty highly unlikely. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
