DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43319>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43319 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-18 04:50 ------- Created an attachment (id=20843) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20843&action=view) A patch to let mod_rewrite flags P and NE co-exist. The problem with mod_proxy (P) flag is that in mod_rewrite:hook_uri2file(request_rec *r) the rulestatus != ACTION_NOESCAPE is checked only in the case when it is not a proxy. while there is nothing done when it is a proxy. On the other hand, the mod_proxy escapes any and every URLs that it gets. so the URL that we passed in with NE gets munged by mod_proxy. The fix is to check for ACTION_NOESCAPE in the if proxy section of mod_rewrite:hook_uri2file(request_rec *r), and set the r->notes apr_table_setn(r->notes, "mod_proxy:flags","NE"); and in mod_proxy_http:proxy_http_canon which is responsible for escaping HTTP URLs, we check for the above flag's existence and if it is there, we let the URL path in with out escaping. The reason notes is named mod_proxy:flags rather than mod_rewrite:flags is that the same flags may be made use of by some other module that needs proxy functionality with out the escaping. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
