DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39727>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39727 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-03 05:18 ------- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > > > Only a recipient that can handle gzip will be served the gzipped version. > > Which isn't true due to this bug. If there is a ETag aware cache between the > client and Apache the client will be given whatever the previous client could > handle. The intermediate got a weak ETag. So the intermediate has been told that the entity is equivalent but not byte-by-byte identical, and may be subject to negotiated transformation. Therefore the intermediate is responsible for dealing with content-negotiated properties. Do you have a particular intermediate in mind, when you propose something that treats a weak ETag as strong? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
