DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42987>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42987 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-30 04:26 ------- Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > There is no real problem in that Apache never matches these weak etags in > If-None-Match. On http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200712.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Roy T. Fielding wrote: > If the weak etags are not being matched to the string etags on > GET, then that is another bug that must be fixed. It is not an > excuse to ignore the HTTP design. Seems to be time that Apache developers make up their mind on what they want to achieve, so it could make sense discussing how to do it in an efficient and comlying way. I was mislead by the asumption, that what Apache does is what it is intended to do. Werner -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
