DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34607>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34607 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #19676|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-09 03:44 ------- Created an attachment (id=21365) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21365&action=view) Patch against SNI code as currently available in trunk (In reply to comment #12) > We can try getting folks behind backporting this to 2.2 sometime in the near > future (although preferably not in the immediately pending release). What are the chances of getting it into 2.2.8, nevertheless? I'm attaching a diff against the current trunk version (committed by Guenter on 2007-12-21/2007-12-29), which basically reflects the version I posted to httpd-dev (see http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200801.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]). It also includes a fix for an issue with SSLVerifyClient in the version posted to httpd-dev on 2008-01-02 I discovered in the meantime (per-directory restrictions were no longer working properly). A backport of this latest version of the code for 2.2.x is available at http://sni.velox.ch/httpd-2.2.x-sni.diff (Guenter, feel free to copy this to people.apache.org) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
