DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44477>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44477 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |INVALID Status|NEW |RESOLVED ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-24 13:48 ------- What standard exactly is being violated here? Some of your assumptions are wrong. When apache sees "get /foo" it treats it exactly like "BAR /foo". In other words, it treats it as an unknown method acting on an improperly-canonicalized directory. It is not doing a case-insensitive match on GET. So what is happening is that apache ignores the method entirely when it receives a request for an improperly-canonicalized directory and simply sends the redirect. In the case of "BAR /foo", apache doesn't even try to determine whether the resource /foo will actually deal with the method BAR. Trying to check this would add considerable complexity for very little gain. And by the way, "get /foo" and even "GET /foo/" are not correct requests in any recent version of http. If you are testing protocol compliance, you should start with a reasonable request. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
