https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45149
--- Comment #1 from Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-08 11:02:52 PST --- Thanks for the patch, but aren't you doing rather too much work here? (1) Why wouldn't a normal subrequest serve for your fake_request? (2) How about mod_request vs your process_post? Hmmm, OK, I think that's a limitation of mod_request rather than of your patch. More importantly, you're touching private parts of mod_cache. That's liable to break at any time. If you can't get what you need from the public API, that's a subject that should be raised on the dev@ list. As it stands, it's something between a patch and a module. Also more fundamental: what protocols does your module implement? I'm not sure what web caching protocols are relevant in the real world (e.g. compatibility with squid would be a plus), but folks on dev@ might know better. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
