https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45762
--- Comment #1 from Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-08 06:36:29 PST --- Can you take the discussion of conn->keepalives/MaxKeepAliveRequests interpretation to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Since it's probably not kosher to re-interpret c->keepalives for anyone who might be looking at it, I think it makes sense to try harder to not log the same value twice: if (c->keepalive == AP_CONN_CLOSE && c->keepalives > 1) // add 1 to what we log Hopefully the confusion could be prevented by revisiting MaxKeepaliveRequests doc and a short hint for the %k doc. Depending on how MaxKeepaliveRequests doc or implementation is changed, it might also be more consistent to log "-" for the first field when c->keepalives==1 -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
