https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47485
--- Comment #9 from Senthilkumar <[email protected]> 2009-07-17 22:24:57 PST --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > > Ok... I am not able to understand your question. Websocket is going change > > the > > web development paradigm and many companies and folks supporting it. New > > way of > > web development may be at least from circa 2005, especially comet which > > influenced Servlet 3.0 Spec. Is it a correct reason to omit something if it > > is > > proposed by a single person? Do you really going to support if Army of > > people > > suggested something useless? I tried to express my thoughts to answer all > > this > > question > > http://pmsenthilkumar.blogspot.com/2009/07/apaches-html5-websocket-conundrum.html > > Don't put words in my mouth. All I said is thst it is incorrect to call it an > "IETF protocol" at this point. If you go back and read your comment "Please do not call it an "IETF" protocol. It's just an Internet Draft submitted by an individual. There is no IETF Working Group for this". I responded because you said "It's just an Internet Draft submitted by an individual". I think now you know why I said. It is the forum and many a people will visit. I don't want to this bug/enhancement request colored by stating the draft submitted by "individual". BTW, It is not my intention to put or pull anything from your mouth. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
