https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45405
--- Comment #21 from D. Stussy <[email protected]> 2011-06-25 22:02:25 UTC --- The value of selecting the port range is that it can be pre-determined and/or reserved in advance and thus programmed into a firewall. Some people prefer stricter control than others. Some may want to reserve other ranges for other programs/services and thus need to tell apache to avoid such. As far as documentation goes, you're the first to ask for it formally. I'll see if I can generate such during July. It won't be substantially different that what was presented in text except for the HTML tags that will be added and a diff file generated. Note that this proposal predated the "simpler one" committed by two years (July 2008 vs. November 2010, but opened in 2004). I'm supposed to know that someone came along, opened a bug in parallel, and did the same work when after 4 years, it still had not been committed -- as opposed to abandoned? Regardless, it was [first] propsoed against Apache version 1 where this approach started with version 2 and ignored 1. Also note that this version is more versitile - in that the address/port range may differ per worker or proxied target, not constant across all proxied connections. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
