https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221
Eric Covener <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #24 from Eric Covener <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #23) > No one has responded to this ticket in a very long time. If, indeed, Eric, > you were waiting for someone else to jump in and take it (as you indicated > on February 11), it appears that nothing is triggering anyone else to look > at this. Is there a way to trigger someone else to look at this in a timely > fashion? I'm not waiting for anything. We're all volunteers motivated by different things without any implied level of service. As an originator, the best you can do is provide your own detail and analysis to not reduce the overhead of whoever looks at the bug report. On 2.4, I can switch between mod_cgid and mod_cgi and run a CGI that does: echo "XXX CGI TEST" >&2 And with mod_cgi, it shows up with the erorrlog prefix, and with mod_cgid it shows up without it. I confirmed on 2.2, mod_cgid behaves the same as it does in 2.4. I didn't bother testing mod_cgi in 2.2. I didn't go back to 2.2.15, just 2.2.latest. You'll need a more concrete reproducible report to minimize the effort of anyone trying to find the bug here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
