https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55443
Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #5 from Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> ---
AFAICT, The format of the 300 response is not defined by HTTP/1.1, so Apache
requires that the client signal it understands the subsequent (abandoned?)
transparent renegotiation related RFCs.
I assume that to get someone interested in adding some other mechanism (or
output format?) for the 300 response, some more context would be needed to
justify/test its usefulness.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-h...@httpd.apache.org
