https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51517
--- Comment #7 from Stefan Rubner <[email protected]> --- Jérôme, I don't know whether you're still following this issue but I ran into the same problem recently. When trying to build a fix I found that by fixing the PATH_INFO issue all other problems you found and described went away, too. The only "problem" that is still left is that my current patch set doesn't produce a clean SCRIPT_NAME but rather leaves the PATH_INFO portion in the string. Personally I think one could live with that but of course I'd like your input on that. If you think that absolute adherence to RFC 3875 is necessary I could try to dive deeper into the code. Anyway, I'd be happy if you could test the attached patches (ugly code, I know. It's currently more a proof of concept than an actual patch) and let me know what you think. -Stefan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
