https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57399
--- Comment #2 from Anders Kaseorg <[email protected]> --- Looking at that code, if replacing 100 ms with -1 would cause the server to miss timers registered when no timers are in progress, then it must already be the case that the server will miss timers registered when a longer timer is in progress. I assumed that, for correctness, anything that registers an earlier timer must also arrange for the listener thread to break out of its current apr_pollset_poll (either via an FD event or via a signal) so that it can be restarted with a lower timeout. If that isn’t already the case, it should be fixed either way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
