https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57832
--- Comment #5 from Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 32734 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32734&action=edit Patch for 2.4.x (r1516930+r1516965+r1530603+r1530792+r1656259+PR57832) (In reply to regilero from comment #4) > I've tried to apply things from r1656259 and then your proposed patch. But > neither patch or myself are able to find where to apply theses changes in > the 2.4 branch. I think you'll need to make a regular 2.4 patch version if > you want me to try it :-) Yes, sorry, there are missing bits before r1656259. The attached patch applies both to 2.4.x and 2.4.12, thanks for testing! > I wonder if preventing any mod_proxy module > to handle non-transactionnal communications is a good move. As you can see, this patch only affects mod_proxy_http and mod_proxy_ajp (both transactionnal), the others do not reuse backend connections when done (polling loop until EOF), hence don't use ap_proxy_is_socket_connected(). The only change here is that the caller can now also know if the socket is readable (in addition to simply still connected), transactionnal proxy modules may use that (as this patch does). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
