https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53555
--- Comment #25 from Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Stefan Fritsch from comment #24) > > (In reply to Yann Ylavic from comment #23) > > How about not setting SERVER_GRACEFUL in close_listeners() and > > worker_thread()? > > The old generation's state could be relevent, since the new generation does > > not "steal" the scoreboard now (until the old worker exits). > > Yes, that would proabaly be better, I'll have to test that. But it would not > fix the incompleteness I was referring to: The old and the new process have > only one process slot in the scoreboard, which makes the async overview > table show sometimes the info from the old and sometimes from the new > process, depending on who updated it last. It seems to me that the new generation's worker threads are not started now unless their scoreboard slot is marked SERVER_DEAD (was also SERVER_GRACEFUL before attachment 33158). So AIUI, there shouldn't be two workers using the same slot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
