https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61222
--- Comment #6 from Joe Orton <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 35321 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35321&action=edit Modified rpluem's patch with more FLUSH Thanks a lot for looking at this Ruediger! You're correct of course on r->bytes_sent, which I completely missed... So I agree it makes sense to keep the loop, but I think we should keep the FLUSH bucket insertion for the EAGAIN case - or is there a good reason to remove it? Hence I'd modify your patch slightly to the attached. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
