https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62232

--- Comment #22 from Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> ---
The issue with Rainer's patch (possibly) is that a <Proxy> section with its own
SSLProxy* settings might finally reuse the SSL_CTX from the upper VirtualHost
(which kind of defeats the changes from 2.4.30+).
That's because the place where is mergeg the ssl_ctx in his patch is also
called before the <Proxy> merge itself (which roughly will do nothing if the
ssl_ctx is already set).

But, in your case, you don't seem to use SSLProxy* directives in <Proxy>
sections, so it shouldn't matter.
Moreover, I didn't tested my patch seriously enough (just a proposal) to
confirm it effectively resolves your issue in the first place, nor that it
works as expected with regard to Rainer's one.
Put another way, I wouldn't recommend using my patch in production without the
same kind of testing you did for Rainer's...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to