https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65725
--- Comment #19 from Ruediger Pluem <[email protected]> --- (In reply to farhanz from comment #16) > In fact, when we were running some tests yesterday, we did follow the steps > you propose. i.e., overwrite the status line and then rewrite it back to the > original and it worked. But we feel that the patch shared on this tracker > originally would be more efficient. This would limit the function to the status lines / codes available inside httpd. Protocol extensions that define further status codes / status lines could not be processed. Some of the callers might rely on this feature. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
