On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:13:46AM -0400, Ross Richardson wrote: > editline(3) fails to mention the possible return > values of el_set(). > > Based on my superficial perusal of the source, it > looks like 0 on success, -1 otherwise. Patch > (based on assumption that this is correct) attached. > --- editline.3.orig Mon May 10 00:03:55 2010 > +++ editline.3 Mon May 10 00:08:07 2010 > @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ parameters. > .Fa op > determines which parameter to set, and each operation has its > own parameter list. > +Returns 0 on success, \-1 on failure. > .Pp > The following values for > .Fa op
fixed by nicm. jmc
