On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 08:57:42PM +0000, Miod Vallat wrote: > > I believe somebody passed that around on a list before, but there are > > other malloc bugs in bt code. > > Oh, probably. Still, this uhci diff looks like the way to go to me (only > _u_hci needs to malloc() after open_pipe() has been called, and > open_pipe() is supposed to not sleep and allowed to report USBD_NOMEM). > This is a genuine usb stack bug. > > Miod
yep. ok jakemsr. -- [email protected] SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
