On 6 May 2013 08:43, Vitaly Sinilin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 3 May 2013 21:26:57 +0200 > Mike Belopuhov <[email protected]> wrote: > > [skip] > >> Thanks for figuring this out. Unfortunately, I think your diff >> is slightly wrong. Since skw and sks are distinct pointers you >> need to keep them in sync when they're equal, otherwise sks will >> point to the old memory. The diff below resets state keys after >> pf_state_key_attach. > > Yes, you are right. As this branch (*sks == *skw) wasn't the case for > my problem I didn't pay enough attention to it. My bad. > >> Would you be so kind to verify that it still fixes the original >> problem? > > Just tested the kernel with the modified patch applied. It works for me > as well. >
I'm looking for OK on this.
