Todd C. Miller:

> > Switching the processing order in getmntname() fixes the behavior.
> > Can anybody think of something that would be broken by this?
> 
> I can't see any reason not do to this.  I'm sure you were trying
> for a minimal diff but doesn't it make more sense to make the loop
> more like the one in umountall()?

I thought the churn would be objected to, but if not, I'm all for
it.

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          na...@mips.inka.de

Reply via email to