Todd C. Miller: > > Switching the processing order in getmntname() fixes the behavior. > > Can anybody think of something that would be broken by this? > > I can't see any reason not do to this. I'm sure you were trying > for a minimal diff but doesn't it make more sense to make the loop > more like the one in umountall()?
I thought the churn would be objected to, but if not, I'm all for it. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de