On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Henning Brauer
<lists-openbsdb...@bsws.de> wrote:
> the old macro expansion issue. pretty much unfixable.
>
> fwiw, I tend to do
>   table <self> persist { self }
> and the use <self>.

Just out of curiosity, is there a reason why you don't use (self)
instead? Unless I misunderstood the code, this creates/reuses an
implicit <self> table under the _pf anchor, which is automatically
updated with any IP changes. The rule evaluation performance should be
the same.

Reply via email to