On 2014/07/17 14:43, Alexander Okonnikov wrote: > Hello, > > Description: > There is bridge interface is created on the host with two ports. An > IP packet with Router Alert option is coming on one of bridge port, but is > not forwarded to another bridge port. Other IP packets (without this IP > option or, perhaps, without any IP option) are successfully forwarded by > the bridge. > > How-To-Repeat: > Bridge interface is created, and two (or more) ports are added to > this bridge. After that IP packet with Router Alert option is coming on one > of the ports of the bridge (in my case I use RSVP Path message for test as > far as this kind of message contains Router Alert option in an IP header). > This message is not forwarded to outgoing bridge port, but dropped > somewhere inside host. Other IP traffic (without Router Alert option) is > forwarded successfully at the same time. Packets with Router Alert option > are being captured on ingress port and on bridge interface, but are not > present on egress port.
Is the packet being blocked by PF? If not, please paste output from tcpdump -eXs1500 of a sample dropped packet (to bugs@ not me personally, inline in the message body), or put a pcap online somewhere and send a link to that.
