> On 12/01/2014 21:49, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > The onus is on you to prove that there are no regressions from what > > you suggest. So, if you don't have time in your schedule to do so, > > uhm, kindly bugger off? > > > > And what the prove might look like?
Look, it obviously takes no more than 10 seconds to notice your change breaks -lk. And then what else does it break?!?! You aren't even trying. PLONK.
