Hi!

Couple of days ago i tried to find out how 5.9-beta behaves as Xen guest under network load using 20160119 snapshot

OpenBSD 5.9-beta (GENERIC.MP) #1851: Mon Jan 18 16:57:00 MST 2016
[email protected]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP

and found that nc client side works like this

server# nc -l 1234 > /dev/null

client# dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=100 | nc 192.168.10.128 1234
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
104857600 bytes transferred in 2.160 secs (48534355 bytes/sec)

but sending more data crashes like this

client# dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=10000 | nc 192.168.10.128 1234
panic: xnf0: save vs spell: 215

Stopped at      Debugger+0x9:   leave
   TID    PID    UID     PRFLAGS     PFLAGS  CPU  COMMAND
*20690  20690      0    0x100003          0    0  nc
Debugger() at Debugger+0x9
panic() at panic+0xfe
xnf_encap() at xnf_encap+0x1a9
xnf_start() at xnf_start+0x7f
ifq_serialize() at ifq_serialize+0xd9
if_enqueue() at if_enqueue+0x71
ether_output() at ether_output+0x166
ip_output() at ip_output+0x6d3
tcp_output() at tcp_output+0x87e
tcp_usrreq() at tcp_usrreq+0x3fc
sosend() at sosend+0x3d8
dofilewritev() at dofilewritev+0x205
sys_write() at sys_write+0x89
syscall() at syscall+0x368
--- syscall (number 4) ---
end of kernel
end trace frame: 0x7f7ffffdd9c0, count: 1
0x647c3d4379a:
http://www.openbsd.org/ddb.html describes the minimum info required in bug
reports.  Insufficient info makes it difficult to find and fix bugs.
ddb{0}> trace
Debugger() at Debugger+0x9
panic() at panic+0xfe
xnf_encap() at xnf_encap+0x1a9
xnf_start() at xnf_start+0x7f
ifq_serialize() at ifq_serialize+0xd9
if_enqueue() at if_enqueue+0x71
ether_output() at ether_output+0x166
ip_output() at ip_output+0x6d3
tcp_output() at tcp_output+0x87e
tcp_usrreq() at tcp_usrreq+0x3fc
sosend() at sosend+0x3d8
dofilewritev() at dofilewritev+0x205
sys_write() at sys_write+0x89
syscall() at syscall+0x368
--- syscall (number 4) ---
end of kernel
end trace frame: 0x7f7ffffdd9c0, count: -14
0x647c3d4379a:
ddb{0}> ps
   TID   PPID   PGRP    UID  S       FLAGS  WAIT          COMMAND
*20690   1161  19848      0  7    0x100003                nc
 19848   1161  19848      0  3    0x100083  pipewr        dd
  1161      1   1161      0  3    0x10008b  pause         ksh
 10194      1  10194      0  3    0x100083  ttyin         getty
 14647      1  14647      0  3    0x100083  ttyin         getty
 15254      1  15254      0  3    0x100083  ttyin         getty
 19020      1  19020      0  3    0x100083  ttyin         getty
 22018      1  22018      0  3    0x100083  ttyin         getty
 23809      1  23809      0  3    0x100098  poll          cron
 12789      1  12789    110  3    0x100090  poll          sndiod
 24171      1  24171     99  3    0x100090  poll          sndiod
 12516  10365  10365     95  3    0x100090  kqread        smtpd
 14650  10365  10365     95  3    0x100090  kqread        smtpd
 22059  10365  10365     95  3    0x100090  kqread        smtpd
 21283  10365  10365     95  3    0x100090  kqread        smtpd
  9188  10365  10365     95  3    0x100090  kqread        smtpd
 10482  10365  10365    103  3    0x100090  kqread        smtpd
 10365      1  10365      0  3    0x100080  kqread        smtpd
 18508      1  18508      0  3        0x80  select        sshd
 30336  17193  24098     83  3    0x100090  poll          ntpd
 17193  24098  24098     83  3    0x100090  poll          ntpd
 24098      1  24098      0  3    0x100080  poll          ntpd
  1012  25162  25162     74  3    0x100090  bpf           pflogd

Before sending in this report i checked today with install59.iso-20160129 and it does not crash that way. Instead it gives nice 50 MByte/s

client# dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=10000 | nc 192.168.10.215 1234
10000+0 records in
10000+0 records out
10485760000 bytes transferred in 189.840 secs (55234480 bytes/sec)

OpenBSD 5.9-beta (GENERIC.MP) #1865: Thu Jan 28 20:18:15 MST 2016
[email protected]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP

So, it seems that this is fixed now one way or another and i am sorry for the noice but i thought to sent it in anyway.


Best regards,

Imre

Reply via email to