> Changing which mode is checked won't help you because security(8) > also complains that printcap(5) is a symlink rather than the expected > regular file. So you would still et spammed. > > Antoine, is it normal that CUPS replaces /etc/printcap with a symlink?
Yes it is. > Any idea how to prevent people from getting spammed about that? > If we had an idea, we could explain it in README-main, which is > already quite good in many other respects. Dunno and it's been years since I haven't read dail(8)/security(8) emails (ever since I put an '*' in hosts.lpd). Maybe we can relax the printcap check a bit? -- Antoine
