David Coppa wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:18 PM, David Coppa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 May 2016, Stefan Kempf wrote:
> >
> >> Hmm, looking closer at your bugzilla link, this somewhat larger diff
> >> should also fix the same problem, but it was committed against GPLv2 
> >> sources.
> >> Still need to try it though.
> >>
> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg00206.html
> >
> > The larger diff works as well, just tested.
> >
> > Here's an adaptation for our tree:
> 
> Just did a 'make build' using the patched gcc: no problems encountered.

Given no other objections, this is ok stefan@
 
> Cheers!
> David
> 
> > Index: gnu/gcc/gcc/builtins.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/gnu/gcc/gcc/builtins.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.7
> > diff -u -p -u -p -r1.7 builtins.c
> > --- gnu/gcc/gcc/builtins.c      28 Dec 2013 02:27:08 -0000      1.7
> > +++ gnu/gcc/gcc/builtins.c      25 May 2016 10:45:39 -0000
> > @@ -8614,13 +8614,8 @@ fold_builtin_isascii (tree arglist)
> >        arg = build2 (BIT_AND_EXPR, integer_type_node, arg,
> >                     build_int_cst (NULL_TREE,
> >                                    ~ (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) 0x7f));
> > -      arg = fold_build2 (EQ_EXPR, integer_type_node,
> > -                        arg, integer_zero_node);
> > -
> > -      if (in_gimple_form && !TREE_CONSTANT (arg))
> > -       return NULL_TREE;
> > -      else
> > -       return arg;
> > +      return fold_build2 (EQ_EXPR, integer_type_node,
> > +                         arg, integer_zero_node);
> >      }
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -8663,12 +8658,8 @@ fold_builtin_isdigit (tree arglist)
> >        arg = fold_convert (unsigned_type_node, TREE_VALUE (arglist));
> >        arg = build2 (MINUS_EXPR, unsigned_type_node, arg,
> >                     build_int_cst (unsigned_type_node, target_digit0));
> > -      arg = fold_build2 (LE_EXPR, integer_type_node, arg,
> > -                        build_int_cst (unsigned_type_node, 9));
> > -      if (in_gimple_form && !TREE_CONSTANT (arg))
> > -       return NULL_TREE;
> > -      else
> > -       return arg;
> > +      return fold_build2 (LE_EXPR, integer_type_node, arg,
> > +                         build_int_cst (unsigned_type_node, 9));
> >      }
> >  }
> >
> > Index: gnu/gcc/gcc/fold-const.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/gnu/gcc/gcc/fold-const.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
> > diff -u -p -u -p -r1.1.1.1 fold-const.c
> > --- gnu/gcc/gcc/fold-const.c    15 Oct 2009 17:11:28 -0000      1.1.1.1
> > +++ gnu/gcc/gcc/fold-const.c    25 May 2016 10:45:40 -0000
> > @@ -6263,11 +6263,6 @@ fold_inf_compare (enum tree_code code, t
> >         return fold_build2 (neg ? GE_EXPR : LE_EXPR, type,
> >                             arg0, build_real (TREE_TYPE (arg0), max));
> >
> > -      /* The transformation below creates non-gimple code and thus is
> > -        not appropriate if we are in gimple form.  */
> > -      if (in_gimple_form)
> > -       return NULL_TREE;
> > -
> >        temp = fold_build2 (neg ? LT_EXPR : GT_EXPR, type,
> >                           arg0, build_real (TREE_TYPE (arg0), max));
> >        return fold_build1 (TRUTH_NOT_EXPR, type, temp);
> > @@ -11215,8 +11210,7 @@ fold_binary (enum tree_code code, tree t
> >                   break;
> >                 }
> >
> > -           else if (!in_gimple_form
> > -                    && TREE_INT_CST_HIGH (arg1) == signed_max_hi
> > +           else if (TREE_INT_CST_HIGH (arg1) == signed_max_hi
> >                      && TREE_INT_CST_LOW (arg1) == signed_max_lo
> >                      && TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (arg1))
> >                      /* signed_type does not work on pointer types.  */
> > Index: gnu/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/gnu/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.2
> > diff -u -p -u -p -r1.2 tree-ssa-ccp.c
> > --- gnu/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.c  28 Dec 2013 02:27:08 -0000      1.2
> > +++ gnu/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.c  25 May 2016 10:45:40 -0000
> > @@ -2063,13 +2063,15 @@ fold_stmt_r (tree *expr_p, int *walk_sub
> >           tem = fold_binary (TREE_CODE (op0), TREE_TYPE (op0),
> >                              TREE_OPERAND (op0, 0),
> >                              TREE_OPERAND (op0, 1));
> > -         set = tem && is_gimple_condexpr (tem);
> > +         set = tem && set_rhs (expr_p, tem);
> >           fold_undefer_overflow_warnings (set, fold_stmt_r_data->stmt, 0);
> >           if (set)
> > -           TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0) = tem;
> > -         t = expr;
> > -          break;
> > +           {
> > +             t = *expr_p;
> > +             break;
> > +           }
> >          }
> > +      return NULL_TREE;
> >
> >      default:
> >        return NULL_TREE;
> > Index: gnu/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-propagate.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/gnu/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-propagate.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
> > diff -u -p -u -p -r1.1.1.1 tree-ssa-propagate.c
> > --- gnu/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-propagate.c    15 Oct 2009 17:11:28 -0000      
> > 1.1.1.1
> > +++ gnu/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-propagate.c    25 May 2016 10:45:40 -0000
> > @@ -571,26 +571,73 @@ set_rhs (tree *stmt_p, tree expr)
> >    ssa_op_iter iter;
> >
> >    /* Verify the constant folded result is valid gimple.  */
> > -  if (TREE_CODE_CLASS (code) == tcc_binary)
> > +  switch (TREE_CODE_CLASS (code))
> >      {
> > +    case tcc_declaration:
> > +      if (!is_gimple_variable(expr))
> > +       return false;
> > +      break;
> > +
> > +    case tcc_constant:
> > +      break;
> > +
> > +    case tcc_binary:
> > +    case tcc_comparison:
> >        if (!is_gimple_val (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0))
> >           || !is_gimple_val (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1)))
> >         return false;
> > -    }
> > -  else if (TREE_CODE_CLASS (code) == tcc_unary)
> > -    {
> > +      break;
> > +
> > +    case tcc_unary:
> >        if (!is_gimple_val (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0)))
> >         return false;
> > +      break;
> > +    case tcc_expression:
> > +      switch (code)
> > +       {
> > +       case ADDR_EXPR:
> > +          if (TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0)) == ARRAY_REF
> > +             && !is_gimple_val (TREE_OPERAND (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0), 1)))
> > +           return false;
> > +         break;
> > +
> > +       case TRUTH_NOT_EXPR:
> > +         if (!is_gimple_val (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0)))
> > +           return false;
> > +         break;
> > +
> > +       case TRUTH_AND_EXPR:
> > +       case TRUTH_XOR_EXPR:
> > +       case TRUTH_OR_EXPR:
> > +         if (!is_gimple_val (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0))
> > +             || !is_gimple_val (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1)))
> > +           return false;
> > +         break;
> > +
> > +       case CALL_EXPR:
> > +       case EXC_PTR_EXPR:
> > +       case FILTER_EXPR:
> > +         break;
> > +
> > +       default:
> > +         return false;
> > +       }
> > +      break;
> > +
> > +    case tcc_exceptional:
> > +      switch (code)
> > +       {
> > +       case SSA_NAME:
> > +         break;
> > +
> > +       default:
> > +         return false;
> > +       }
> > +      break;
> > +
> > +    default:
> > +      return false;
> >      }
> > -  else if (code == ADDR_EXPR)
> > -    {
> > -      if (TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0)) == ARRAY_REF
> > -         && !is_gimple_val (TREE_OPERAND (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0), 1)))
> > -       return false;
> > -    }
> > -  else if (code == COMPOUND_EXPR
> > -          || code == MODIFY_EXPR)
> > -    return false;
> >
> >    if (EXPR_HAS_LOCATION (stmt)
> >        && EXPR_P (expr)

Reply via email to