> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 09:42:23AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Paul Fariello <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Ok. I didn't notice that relayd had a security filtering focus. If so, > > > enforcing presence/absence of body is legit. > > > > Perhaps the security.html page on the openbsd site would interest you? > > Did you know, for example, that openbsd has a "Secure by Default" > > policy? > > This raise an interesting question. Does "Secure by Default" means only > - produce secure software > or does it means > - produce software that not only is secure but secures others part of > the OS
That raises an interesting question. Can you read something and understand it as it is, or do you have to insert your biases and views into it? > My point of view is that producing secure software is difficult enough. > If one want to really protect external piece of software it should use > dedicated software. Who cares. So write your own software and use it.
