Theo de Raadt wrote: > Yes, but once again I don't know what this is trying to help. > > Just you, I think. Maybe someone else? > > I am unsure if these 6-line chunks belong in /etc. The configuration > is way out of default.
Configuration creep. Start with six lines to support readonly /usr because "it can't hurt". Next feature needs six more lines. Then six more lines. Now it looks like readonly /usr is supported. Look at all these lines that make it work!
