Hi Ken,

I updated my vultr vm to latest snapshot and the original issue was fixed
but when I reboot the machine the following was displayed in the console:

[[email protected]:~]$ doas dmesg -s
doas ([email protected]) password:
Automatic boot in progress: starting file system checks.
/dev/sd0a (2719ba15e0dec7c1.a): file system is clean; not checking
/dev/sd0k (2719ba15e0dec7c1.k): file system is clean; not checking
/dev/sd0d (2719ba15e0dec7c1.d): file system is clean; not checking
/dev/sd0f (2719ba15e0dec7c1.f): file system is clean; not checking
/dev/sd0g (2719ba15e0dec7c1.g): file system is clean; not checking
/dev/sd0h (2719ba15e0dec7c1.h): file system is clean; not checking
/dev/sd0j (2719ba15e0dec7c1.j): file system is clean; not checking
/dev/sd0i (2719ba15e0dec7c1.i): file system is clean; not checking
/dev/sd0e (2719ba15e0dec7c1.e): file system is clean; not checking
setting tty flags
pf enabled
net.inet.ip.forwarding: 0 -> 1
net.inet.gre.allow: 0 -> 1
net.pipex.enable: 0 -> 1
starting network
vio0: /var/db/dhclient.leases.vio0 line 17: expecting semicolon.
vio0:   rebind
vio0:   ^
vio0: /var/db/dhclient.leases.vio0 line 19: expecting semicolon.
vio0: }
vio0: ^
vio0: /var/db/dhclient.leases.vio0 line 20: unterminated lease declaration.
vio0:
vio0: ^
vio0: RTM_DESYNC
vio0: DHCPDISCOVER - interval 1
vio0: DHCPOFFER from 169.254.169.254 (fe:00:00:7c:b5:7b)
vio0: DHCPREQUEST to 255.255.255.255
vio0: DHCPACK from 169.254.169.254 (fe:00:00:7c:b5:7b)
vio0: bound to 45.77.34.221 -- renewal in 43200 seconds
reordering libraries: done.
starting early daemons: syslogd pflogd rebound ntpd isakmpd npppd.
starting RPC daemons:.
savecore: no core dump
checking quotas: done.
clearing /tmp
kern.securelevel: 0 -> 1
creating runtime link editor directory cache.
preserving editor files.
starting network daemons: sshd smtpd httpd spamd spamlogd sndiod.
starting local daemons: apmd cron.
Thu Oct 12 12:15:46 +08 2017


Regards,
Glenn



On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Kenneth R Westerback <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 03:28:39PM +0000, Anthony Coulter wrote:
> > I upgraded OpenBSD 6.1 to 6.2 on a Vultr node and after the first
> > reboot dhclient reports this new error:
> >
> > /var/db/dhclient.leases.vio0 line 15: Expecting CIDR prefix length.
> >   option classless-static-routes 0.0.0.0/33
> >                                          ^
> >
> > At this moment I both OpenBSD 6.1 and 6.2 are running on different
> > instances of Vultr nodes. Copying different versions of /sbin/dhclient
> > back and forth between my boxes shows that they're putting different
> > classless-static-routes lines in the leases file:
> >
> > option classless-static-routes 0.0.0.0/0 108.61.190.1,
> 169.254.169.254/32 108.61.190.1;
> > option classless-static-routes 0.0.0.0/33 108.61.190.1,
> 169.254.169.254/32 108.61.190.1;
> >
> > (The top line is created by a 6.1 dhclient executable; the bottom line
> > is created by 6.2.)
> >
> > Here's a tcpdump trace showing what happens when I renew my lease on
> > the server in question. Since "classless-static-routes" is option 121,
> > I was expecting to see a "79" (hex) somewhere in the response, but I
> > don't. So I have no idea where dhclient is getting the invalid mask
> > length from.
> >
> > # doas tcpdump -nXi vio0 port 67 and port 68
> > tcpdump: listening on vio0, link-type EN10MB
> > 11:22:13.801668 108.61.190.203.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: xid:0xc9048474
> [|bootp] [tos 0x10]
> >   0000: 4510 0148 0000 0000 8011 0e8d 6c3d becb  E..H........l=..
> >   0010: ffff ffff 0044 0043 0134 57f1 0101 0600  .....D.C.4W.....
> >   0020: c904 8474 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000  ...t............
> >   0030: 0000 0000 0000 0000 5600 0035 275c 0000  ........V..5'\..
> >   0040: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000  ................
> >   0050: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000  ................
> >   0060: 0000 0000 0000                           ......
> >
> > 11:22:13.803582 169.254.169.254.67 > 108.61.190.203.68: xid:0xc9048474
> Y:108.61.190.203 [|bootp] [tos 0xc0]
> >   0000: 45c0 0157 30df 0000 4011 c8f1 a9fe a9fe  E..W0...@.......
> >   0010: 6c3d becb 0043 0044 0143 f7de 0201 0600  l=...C.D.C......
> >   0020: c904 8474 0000 0000 0000 0000 6c3d becb  ...t........l=..
> >   0030: 0000 0000 0000 0000 5600 0035 275c 0000  ........V..5'\..
> >   0040: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000  ................
> >   0050: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000  ................
> >   0060: 0000 0000 0000                           ......
> >
> > ^C
> > 170 packets received by filter
> > 0 packets dropped by kernel
> >
> > Regards,
> > Anthony Coulter
> >
>
> Argh. Need to read to end of email before replying.
>
> I'm looking into this.
>
> .... Ken
>
>

Reply via email to