On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 07:18:29PM +0100, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
> On 03/01/18 09:07, Jiri B wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 08:37:38AM +0100, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
> >>Please let me know if you need further infos on my specific config.
> >
> >I use this (OpenBSD 6.2-current (GENERIC.MP) #6: Tue Feb 13 20:16:11 MST 
> >2018):
> >
> >/etc/hostname.vether20
> >
> >rdomain 20
> >inet 172.16.20.2 255.255.255.0 172.16.20.255 description "archive rdomain" 
> >group onion
> >!ifconfig lo20 inet 127.0.0.1/8
> >!route -T20 -qn add -net 127 127.0.0.1 -reject
> >!route -T20 -qn add default 172.16.20.1
> >
> 
> thanks -- your variant for setting an IP address for lo(4) in the underlying
> interface's rdomain is less evil than delaying the ifconfig statement until
> /etc/rc.local is run. Your variant also still works on current.
> 
> Nevertheless, I suppose there was nothing inherently wrong with my previous
> approach to configuring an IP address for loX via /etc/hostname.loX which is
> now broken on current. Or is there a good reason I'm not aware of that this
> variant doesn't work anymore?
> 

I will revert the changes to automatically configure the lo interfaces in
-current. That should get us back to where it was before. Still I think
rdomains should automatically have a 127.0.0.1 and ::1 IP configured just
need to figure out how to do this properly.

-- 
:wq Claudio

Reply via email to