On 04/03/18 14:41, Florian Obser wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 01:17:06PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>>
>> Except for changing the link local IPv6 addresses the upgrade
>
> Hmm? But you added -soii? So the link local v6 address should not have
> changed?
>
Indeed. I had expected that the RFC 7217 format is used only
for global routable IP addresses. I don't see a benefit for
link-local addresses in the new SLAAC format.
>> to 6.3 worked very well. No surprises, AFAICTBN.
>>
Actually there is a surprise: Apparently my OpenBSD gateway
cannot ping the traditional SLAAC addresses ("ff:fe") in the
internal network anymore (using the global routable IPv6 prefix).
Even if I disable the packet filter. 80/tcp and others are
affected, too.
The hosts with a RFC 7217 address can be pinged.
"netstat -nr -f inet6" shows both SLAAC styles, e.g.
Routing tables
Internet6:
Destination Gateway Flags
Refs Use Mtu Prio Iface
default fe80::%pppoe0 UGS
0 29832 - 8 pppoe0
::/96 ::1 UGRS
0 10 32768 8 lo0
::1 ::1 UHhl
11 22 32768 1 lo0
::ffff:0.0.0.0/96 ::1 UGRS
0 0 32768 8 lo0
2002::/24 ::1 UGRS
0 0 32768 8 lo0
2002:7f00::/24 ::1 UGRS
0 0 32768 8 lo0
2002:e000::/20 ::1 UGRS
0 0 32768 8 lo0
2002:ff00::/24 ::1 UGRS
0 0 32768 8 lo0
2001:db8:b71c:d700::/56 ::1 UGRS
0 1 32768 8 lo0
2001:db8:b71c:d703::/64 2001:db8:b71c:d703::1 UCn
16 8 - 4 re1
2001:db8:b71c:d703::1 80:ee:73:95:c1:0d UHLl
0 9313 - 1 re1
2001:db8:b71c:d703:652:f3ff:feab:7480 link#3 UHLc
0 14 - 3 re1
2001:db8:b71c:d703:3612:98ff:fe77:d245 link#3 UHLc
0 14 - 3 re1
2001:db8:b71c:d703:40a0:1948:aaf:7d34 b0:e5:ed:ec:01:1c UHLc
0 233 - 3 re1
2001:db8:b71c:d703:51d2:369f:fab2:18e9 f4:6d:04:73:ab:4e UHLc
0 13552 - 3 re1
2001:db8:b71c:d703:5ab0:35ff:fe81:5c86 link#3 UHLc
0 21 - 3 re1
2001:db8:b71c:d703:6ead:f8ff:fe82:d4c2 link#3 UHLc
0 22 - 3 re1
2001:db8:b71c:d703:7529:94e3:613d:bacb 6c:ad:f8:82:d4:c2 UHLc
0 21061 - 3 re1
2001:db8:b71c:d703:7e2f:80ff:feb8:f0a link#3 UHLc
0 14 - 3 re1
2001:db8:b71c:d703:8689:adff:fed3:b078 link#3 UHLc
0 14 - 3 re1
2001:db8:b71c:d703:8e85:90ff:fe4e:b0a link#3 UHLc
0 14 - 3 re1
2001:db8:b71c:d703:8efa:baff:fea1:3b24 link#3 UHLc
0 14 - 3 re1
2001:db8:b71c:d703:a288:69ff:fe50:48d0 link#3 UHLc
0 68 - 3 re1
2001:db8:b71c:d703:b2e5:edff:feec:11c link#3 UHLc
0 15 - 3 re1
2001:db8:b71c:d703:e269:95ff:fe68:8077 link#3 UHLc
1 4413 - 3 re1
2001:db8:b71c:d703:f1d2:b843:31ed:1b17 58:b0:35:81:5c:86 UHLc
0 40 - 3 re1
2001:db8:b71c:d703:f66d:4ff:fe73:ab4e link#3 UHLc
0 14 - 3 re1
fe80::/10 ::1 UGRS
0 24 32768 8 lo0
fec0::/10 ::1 UGRS
0 0 32768 8 lo0
fe80::%re1/64 fe80::82ee:73ff:fe95:c10d%re1 UCn
11 19 - 4 re1
fe80::cb9:dd1e:67ab:6f0f%re1 34:12:98:77:d2:45 UHLc
0 685 - 3 re1
fe80::ccd:11ce:ac88:e7bc%re1 84:89:ad:d3:b0:78 UHLc
0 306 - 3 re1
fe80::d0b:6ccb:a4c0:167c%re1 link#3 UHLc
0 14 - 3 re1
fe80::14ca:b397:2849:6750%re1 04:52:f3:ab:74:80 UHLc
0 344 - 3 re1
fe80::1881:5cc5:9b30:1530%re1 58:b0:35:81:5c:86 UHLc
0 69 - 3 re1
fe80::1c92:4b17:8165:966b%re1 8c:fa:ba:a1:3b:24 UHLc
0 33 - 3 re1
fe80::6ead:f8ff:fe82:d4c2%re1 6c:ad:f8:82:d4:c2 UHLc
0 547 - 3 re1
fe80::82ee:73ff:fe95:c10d%re1 80:ee:73:95:c1:0d UHLl
0 3032 - 1 re1
fe80::a288:69ff:fe50:48d0%re1 a0:88:69:50:48:d0 UHLc
0 121 - 3 re1
fe80::b2e5:edff:feec:11c%re1 b0:e5:ed:ec:01:1c UHLc
0 115 - 3 re1
fe80::d9a7:52cd:c5a7:4d1b%re1 f4:6d:04:73:ab:4e UHLc
0 985 - 3 re1
fe80::e269:95ff:fe68:8077%re1 e0:69:95:68:80:77 UHLc
0 1153 - 3 re1
fe80::1%lo0 fe80::1%lo0 UHl
0 0 32768 1 lo0
fe80::%pppoe0/64 fe80::665a:4ff:fe35:830a%pppoe0 Uhn
1 3 - 4 pppoe0
fe80::101:101:3e9b:f1ab%pppoe0 pppoe0 UHL
0 64 - 4 pppoe0
fe80::665a:4ff:fe35:830a%pppoe0 fe80::665a:4ff:fe35:830a%pppoe0 UHl
0 13 - 1 pppoe0
ff01::/16 ::1 UGRS
0 2 32768 8 lo0
ff01::%re1/32 fe80::82ee:73ff:fe95:c10d%re1 Um
0 1 - 4 re1
ff01::%lo0/32 ::1 Um
0 1 32768 4 lo0
ff01::%pppoe0/32 fe80::665a:4ff:fe35:830a%pppoe0 Um
0 0 - 4 pppoe0
ff02::/16 ::1 UGRS
0 2 32768 8 lo0
ff02::%re1/32 fe80::82ee:73ff:fe95:c10d%re1 Um
0 37 - 4 re1
ff02::%lo0/32 ::1 Um
0 1 32768 4 lo0
ff02::%pppoe0/32 fe80::665a:4ff:fe35:830a%pppoe0 Um
0 0 - 4 pppoe0
I understand that the slaac stuff has been changed and that there is
a new daemon. Surely I have to verify the local configuration first.
Regards
Harri
