Sure you ran on a global scale. Uh huh. How's that working for you? I'm in o&g in one of the top 3 and the only openbsd you see never maybe someone like you who we break off a VM for to make them happy so they can run their silly ntp server for their 3 person OU. Come on. I'd love to hear more about your corporate NFS openbsd servers . Please.
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 3:04 AM Andy Kosela <[email protected]> wrote: > MB <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Invest in a NetApp filer and do it the right way. Plenty of options > > spectrascale glfs/cnfs lustre with DNE/IME why struggle with this hobby > OS, > > seriously? > > > > On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 1:31 AM MB <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Why are you using ooenbsd for anything but a firewall. Even then its > > > lagging way behind unless you deploying in a dentist office. Openbsd > sucks > > > at pretty much everything else. Sorry I come from corporate real world > > > experience not Soho stuff. Use Linux. > > > > > A couple of points: > > (1) Stop top-posting. > (2) NetApp is using BSD nfs code. > (3) I have run OpenBSD in a "corporate world" on a global scale and it > usually outperforms everything else, including Linux, and > definitely is much more stable and secure. > (4) If OpenBSD "sucks" and you are on a mailing list that "sucks", your > life must be truly miserable. > > To the original author of this thread -- nfs is a UNIX technology, > originally made for Unix to Unix communication on a network. Windows > client support came later and it is still not stellar. Samba/CIFS is > what is a usual scenario here. > > But if you are serious about this and want to attract developers' > attention then please become familiar with sendbug(1). > > http://www.openbsd.org/report.html > > > > --Andy >
