Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote:

> On 2018/08/11 19:32, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> >                                                          I am also
> > unsure if loadfirmware() steal the slaacd context due to the use of
> > `curproc'.
> 
> since it was using ifconfig context (as seen with unveil) that seems likely

In the ps listing there is a * next to slaacd.

This is not ifconfig's context.  It crashed in pledge code, because it
was a process which is pledged.  Which is the slaacd master.

It is a very tricky and fun bug.

Reply via email to