Ooh, thank you sir, this is perfect! Works like a charm on 6.5 with the original setup.
Daniel ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Thursday, 9 May 2019 00:47, Claudio Jeker <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 07:58:04PM +0000, Lévai, Dániel wrote: > > > So it seems that by flushing the pass/block rules from the bridge(4) the > > leak has been plugged on this router. > > Please try the following diff. This is fixing a obvious mem leak in one > special case (this may be why you did not notice it on the other system). > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > :wq Claudio > > Index: if_bridge.c > > ================================ > > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_bridge.c,v > retrieving revision 1.329 > diff -u -p -r1.329 if_bridge.c > --- if_bridge.c 3 May 2019 16:53:07 -0000 1.329 > +++ if_bridge.c 8 May 2019 22:42:48 -0000 > @@ -808,6 +808,10 @@ bridge_enqueue(struct ifnet *ifp, struct > (m->m_flags & (M_BCAST | M_MCAST)) == 0) > > continue; > > > - if (bridge_filterrule(&bif->bif_brlout, eh, m) == > > > - BRL_ACTION_BLOCK) > > > - continue; > > > - if (SLIST_NEXT(bif, bif_next) == NULL) { > used = 1; > mc = m; > > > > @@ -819,10 +823,6 @@ bridge_enqueue(struct ifnet *ifp, struct > } > } > > - if (bridge_filterrule(&bif->bif_brlout, eh, mc) == > > > - BRL_ACTION_BLOCK) > > > - continue; > > > - error = bridge_ifenqueue(brifp, dst_if, mc); > if (error) > continue; > > > > @@ -1249,7 +1249,8 @@ bridge_broadcast(struct bridge_softc *sc > if (protected != 0 && (protected & bif->bif_protected)) > > continue; > > > - if (bridge_filterrule(&bif->bif_brlout, eh, m) == BRL_ACTION_BLOCK) > > > > - if (bridge_filterrule(&bif->bif_brlout, eh, m) == > > > - BRL_ACTION_BLOCK) > continue; > > > > /*
