On 2019/12/03 17:25, Lars Schotte wrote: > And, yes, with the syspatches for mips64, that's what I wanted to hint. > That would be very nice. I have one x86_64 VM running and syspatches > are very useful there, because it is fast and just works. That's one of > the best features in OpenBSD lately.
They are handy for those few machines where it's difficult to run -current (I don't have so many of those though, even with "production" machines), but realistically those developers who are building and signing syspatches have a lot to deal with for the existing architectures - adding more is quite likely not really viable. This is one of the factors that users should consider when deciding to use a less common arch.
