On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 09:25 Marc Espie <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:26:05PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 09:23:24PM -0500, Morgan Aldridge wrote: > > > >Synopsis: `pkg_info -Q` shows incomplete package results on 6.6 > > > release/stable > > > >Category: package management > > > >Environment: > > > > > > System : OpenBSD 6.6 > > > > > > Details : OpenBSD 6.6 (GENERIC.MP) #4: Wed Jan 15 > 10:55:43 MST > > > 2020 > > > [email protected]: > > > /usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP > > > > > > > > > Architecture: OpenBSD.amd64 > > > > > > Machine : amd64 > > > > > > >Description: > > > > > > Running `pkg_info -Q ruby` on 6.6 release/stable results in a > > > subset \ > > > of matching packages, specifically those from packages-stable. One > must \ > > > manually specify a PKG_PATH for release to get the remaining matching \ > > > packages. > > > > Thanks, the man page for pkg_info needs some love. Specifically, the > > description of -Q is a lie. It will look in installurl and/or PKG_PATH. > > > > Search *by design* stops at the first repository where matching packages > are > > found. > > > > I won't change that behavior, but I can probably ask -a to look further. > > > > This requires surgery in Search.pm, don't hold your horses. > > > According to plan, Search.pm/PackageRepository.pm and pkg_info in -current > now feature -aQ to query *all* repos instead of stopping at the first one > with matching searches.
Many thanks, Marc! > -- Morgan --- http://makkintosshu.com/ http://centresteer.com/ http://seriesparts.com/ http://unna.org/
