Stefan Sperling (2020-03-14 18:12 +0100): > On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 05:36:46PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > Looking a the diff, I do see a use-after-free. > > The problem is the use of TAILQ_FOREACH(wn, ...) instead of > TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(wn, ...) in combination with free(wn), correct?
Most likely, yes.
