Filippo Valsorda <[email protected]> wrote: > 2020-10-24 19:01 GMT+02:00 Theo de Raadt <[email protected]>: > > Filippo Valsorda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Said another way, how was I supposed to find out this is unsupported? > > The way you just found out. > > > It's not like "a mirrored full-disk encrypted device" is an exotic > > configuration that would give me pause. > > there's a song that goes "You can't always get what you want" > > Nothing is perfect. Do people rail against other groups in the same way? > > Alright, I'm disengaging. > > This was a bizarre interaction, I just reported a crash that doesn't > even affect me anymore (I was disassembling that system), trying to > follow the reporting guidelines as much as possible, for something that > I had no way of knowing was unsupported. >
You are disengaging... but just have to get ONE MORE snipe in! Meanwhile, no diff. Not for the kernel, that would be difficult. But no diff for the manual pages either (it is rather obviously that the people who hit this would know what what pages they read, and where they should have seen a warning, and what form it should take) But no. Either the margin is too narrow for such a diff, and it's easier to assume that "I am right" commentary will generate results. Some users really are their own worst enemy.
