Patrick Wildt <patr...@blueri.se> writes: > Am Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 03:25:46PM -0700 schrieb Rafael Ávila de Espíndola: >> >> Patrick Wildt <patr...@blueri.se> writes: >> >> > Am Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 09:24:46AM -0700 schrieb Rafael Ávila de Espíndola: >> >> Patrick Wildt <patr...@blueri.se> writes: >> >> >> >> > Am Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 08:17:09AM -0700 schrieb Rafael Ávila de >> >> > Espíndola: >> >> >> Got the same error this morning after updating to MP#408. >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> Rafael >> >> > >> >> > Is this a regression? Did 6.8 work and 6.9-beta broke it? Were you >> >> > already following snapshots and switching from one snapshot to the >> >> > other broke it? >> >> >> >> I was following snapshots, but not very frequently. The last one that I >> >> was using without any problems was from Feb 15 (or at least that is when >> >> I got the "upgrade log" email). >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Rafael >> > >> > Can this be the cause? There have been only few changes in ACPI, and >> > this definitely does some AML store thing: >> > >> > https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/c1053d6a5a6ff0c23fa9cda5b6bd2d6feb9d82b6 >> >> Yes, that is the one. A patch with >> c1053d6a5a6ff0c23fa9cda5b6bd2d6feb9d82b6, >> abe2aacc6845fd5ce80896a50e770d4116e9f80c and >> 71a585ed804adbdd9d4eee13175b0812699dc34b reverted boots fine, but one >> with just the last two reverted fails in the same way as the snapshot. >> >> Thanks, >> Rafael >> > > Wait, so which one is it?
c1053d6a5a6ff0c23fa9cda5b6bd2d6feb9d82b6 is the one that causes the problem. Cheers, Rafael
