Hi, On Fri, 29 Apr 2022, at 9:08 PM, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote: > let there be a rule in pf: > pass in on em0 from any to em0:3 > > now how we are going to deal with situation when address :2 > disappear? shell we keep indexes assigned? shell we reindex? > how this should work for dynamic variant: ... any to (em0:3) > there is still more question than answers. > > I agree it appears fairly simple at first glance, but it's not.
Yeah, makes sense. This (and the next one) were just extras - the main issue is not being able to use the interface name to get the IP on v6. > I'm afraid this would be pretty big change to pf. I'm just curious: > what kind of advantage single rule for both address families brings? > in other words why do you need it? It just removes the need for two separate rules. No biggie though. Thanks, Ian
