On 18.7.2022. 10:40, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote: > hello, > > On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 11:52:21PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote: >> On 17.7.2022. 20:19, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote: >>> So in case 49/27 we are supposed to be selecting addresses: >>> 49.0.0.1, 49.0.0.2, ..., 49.0.0.30, 49.0.0.1 >>> we need to make sure selection mechanism skips network >>> address (49.0.0.0) and network broadcast address (49.0.0.31). >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm I understanding you correctly? If doing NAT to some route, let's say >> /30 (4 addresses) with this diff I will doing NAT only to 2 addresses? >> >> >> >> > > yes. I believe this should be correct. but I would like to > get it confirmed with someone who is stronger in network protocols. > > 0000 0000 > > if we have a prafix /30 then the hosts we can address are: > .1 > .2 > the host part .3 should be a network broadcast. let's assume > we have something like: 192.168.1.8/30, then the network > broadcast address will be 192.168.1.11 > > to be honest I'm not sure if we can assign address > 192.168.8.0 to any host in that network.
In my carp/pfsync setup's I have /30 route for NAT and I would like to NAT to all 4 addresses. If that's not possible, is right way to do NAT create table and list there ip by ip ?
