On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 07:34:04PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote: > I suspect missing netlock in the config path or within timeout handler, > but exclusive netlock assertion makes sense. > > Also, we could have "double protection" here, like we have for > `if_list'. I mean we hold both kernel and net locks while we modify > `if_list', but while we do read access, we hold only one of them. I > don't like this, but my diffs for `if_list' were rejected.
My box is running with this patch now. I'll report back when something shows up. Thanks!
