On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 10:46:43AM +0900, Tranchemer Stéphane wrote: > Thanks so much for this very clear explanation, I didn’t know that one. > > I have a question regarding the patch I successfully applied on the kernel, > could such modification be accepted as a syspatch in the actual 7.4 release > or should it be expected in CURRENT and planned for the next to come 7.5 > release?
I have committed it to -current, so it will be in 7.5. Hardware support changes don't normally get backported to stable branches. > > Also Mark, I honestly would have never found myself the "mach comaddr 0xe060" > option to set at boot, is it something that there’s no other way than set it > yourself or could it be part of a patch to set up automatically? the line can be placed in /etc/boot.conf commands are described in boot(8) > > Thank you all. > > > > > Le 2024/01/28 à 03:46, Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > On 2024/01/28 00:20, stephane Tranchemer wrote: > >> Got it ! > >> I had a hunch so I modified all the tty0X the same way as tty00 to see if > >> someone answers: > >> tty00 "/usr/libexec/getty std.115200" vt220 on secure > >> and I got a tty at next reboot. > >> However I find myself on tty04, so it would mean that com4 goes invariably > >> to tty04 even if this port is the only com port I do have on my system as > >> show by dmesg? > >> I would have expected to have it on tty00. > > > > on amd64/i386, 00 to 03 are reserved for serial ports at specific known > > addresses (0x3f8, 0x3e8, 0x2f8, 0x2e8). dynamically attached ports have > > higher numbers. >
