Hi all


Once again device was restarted. I collected additional information regarding 
this problem. (1. show register; 2. show uvm; 3. show bcstats; 4. show panic; 
5. show trace)



kernel: double fault trap, code=0

Stopped at      setrunnable+0x1df:      ret



  1.  ddb{1}> show register

rdi                              0xc

rsi                                0

rbp               0xffff800022803a90

rbx               0xfffffd810003ff00

rdx               0x8000000000000000

rcx                            0x282

rax                              0xd

r8                                 0

r9                                 0

r10               0xd9a168fe801b8edb

r11               0x7e687e3ad68f1356

r12               0xffff80000002b380

r13                                0

r14               0xffff8000226b27f8

r15                              0x8

rip               0xffffffff817939ff    setrunnable+0x1df

cs                               0x8

rflags                       0x10246    __ALIGN_SIZE+0xf246

rsp                                0

ss                              0x10

setrunnable+0x1df:      ret



  1.  ddb{1}> show uvm



Current UVM status:

  pagesize=4096 (0x1000), pagemask=0xfff, pageshift=12

  1005751 VM pages: 22522 active, 154072 inactive, 1 wired, 648129 free (81908 
zero)

  min  10% (25) anon, 10% (25) vnode, 5% (12) vtext

  freemin=33525, free-target=44700, inactive-target=0, wired-max=335250

  faults=7531385, traps=7529184, intrs=46999471, ctxswitch=112612553 fpuswitch=0

  softint=5166285, syscalls=8807983, kmapent=12

  fault counts:

    noram=0, noanon=0, noamap=0, pgwait=0, pgrele=0

    ok relocks(total)=207464(210121), anget(retries)=2939116(0), 
amapcopy=3057474

    neighbor anon/obj pg=538323/4590684, gets(lock/unlock)=1630843/210146

    cases: anon=2448411, anoncow=490705, obj=1366580, prcopy=261581, 
przero=2964094



  daemon and swap counts:

    woke=0, revs=0, scans=0, obscans=0, anscans=0

    busy=0, freed=0, reactivate=0, deactivate=0

    pageouts=0, pending=0, nswget=0

    nswapdev=1

    swpages=263063, swpginuse=0, swpgonly=0 paging=0

--db_more--             kernel pointers: 
objs(kern)=0xffffffff824c5088



  1.  ddb{1}> show bcstats



Current Buffer Cache status:

numbufs 41146 busymapped 0, delwri 1

kvaslots 6553 avail kva slots 6553

bufpages 162588, dmapages 162588, dirtypages 2

pendingreads 0, pendingwrites 0

highflips 0, highflops 0, dmaflips 0



  1.  ddb{1}> show panic



the kernel did not panic



  1.  ddb{1}> trace



setrunnable(ffff8000226b27f8) at setrunnable+0x1df

wakeup_n(ffff80000002b380,1) at wakeup_n+0x70

task_add(ffff80000002b380,ffff80000801ed58) at task_add+0x83

wg_decap(ffff800000792000,fffffd80bc4fe200) at wg_decap+0x318

wg_decap_worker(ffff800000792000) at wg_decap_worker+0x7a

taskq_thread(ffff800000791f00) at taskq_thread+0x100

end trace frame: 0x0, count: -6



Srdačan pozdrav / Best regards

--

Nemanja Domazetović

Senior IT Network inženjer

Kappa Star Group,

Bulevar kneza Aleksandra Karađorđevića 36,

11000 Beograd,

Srbija

e-mail: [email protected]

web: https://www.kappastar.com

Čuvajte drveće. Nemojte štampati ovu poruku ako to nije neophodno. / Please 
consider the environment before printing this email.



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Claudio Jeker
Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 12:58 PM
To: Nemanja Domazetović <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: wireguard problem?



On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 11:40:08AM +0000, Nemanja Domazetović wrote:

> HI all

>

> In deed my colleague recently reported problem with server who has

> queueing mechanism. But in this case, this is not an issue. I also

> checked other locations, which are working properly so far, and there

> I can see that on those location, which are not patched to syspatch

> 13, I still didn't have any kernel panic. Two of those locations have

> 013_unbound but I still didn't get any kernel panic.



013_unbound is a pure userland change. So I doubt it has any influence on 
wg(4). I think there are locking issues in wg(4) that cause it to break under 
some loads.



> Right now, I will wait for next kernel panic on my device and check

> this show registers. Hope it will give more insight into this problem.

--

:wq Claudio


Reply via email to