Jeremie Courreges-Anglas <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 12:18:05PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > I'm surprised at your proposal. > > > > If this condition gets detected, why do you think it is fine to > > continue? A kernel data structure is seriously corrupted. > > I'm not saying it's fine, sorry if my mail was too long to read. ;) > > 1. I'm not 100% sure the checks that trigger are correct, after all > they're not using volatile reads. Maaaaybe that's the bug but I > have no idea right now. > > 2. Kurt had posted this on ports@ earlier, then on bugs@, so far no > one has a fix and you recently tagged 7.9. This diff is an attempt > to make kmos' and users life easier before next release. Obviously > everybody would be happier with a proper fix. Maybe this admittedly > incomplete fix will spark a discussion?
Maybe. But you cannot delete that ddb enter. You could replace it with a panic. If you continue to run after that printf, the system will just crash in other unknown ways which are more difficult to debug.
